This project analyzes the economic effects of the Section 232 steel tariffs implemented by the Trump administration. Using a partial equilibrium model and data from the U.S. International Trade Commission, this repository visualizes the impact on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and the resulting deadweight loss in the U.S. steel market.
The implementation of import tariffs under the Trump administration marked a significant shift in U.S. trade policy. This project applies microeconomic theory to analyze the consequences of these trade barriers on the American economy and overall welfare. This theoretical framework is then connected to empirical data to understand the full incentives behind, and outcomes of, the import tariffs.
The standard tool for analyzing the effects of an import tariff is the partial equilibrium model. This model illustrates how a tariff raises the domestic price from the world price (Pw) to a new, higher price (Pw + Tariff). This leads to the following theoretical consequences:
The visualization in this project is based on empirical data from the report “Economic Impact of Section 232 and 301 Tariffs on U.S. Industries” by the U.S. International Trade Commission, using 2017 as the pre-tariff baseline year.
Key Data Points for the Model:
An interactive graph, generated with Python and Plotly, visualizes this data. The graph clearly shows the different economic areas and illustrates the deadweight loss created by the tariffs.
» Click here to view the interactive graph «
The analysis confirms that the partial equilibrium model aligns well with the observed primary effects on the steel market. Data from the 2018-2021 period shows that the tariffs led to reduced imports of targeted steel products (-24.0%), higher domestic prices (+2.4%), and a slight increase in domestic production (+1.9%).
However, empirical observations reveal a reality more complex than the model can fully capture. The model does not account for critical secondary effects, such as retaliatory tariffs from trade partners like China, which subsequently harmed U.S. export industries, particularly agriculture. Furthermore, domestic manufacturers reliant on steel faced higher input costs, which reduced their competitiveness and, in some cases, led to job losses.
In summary, while the model is an effective tool for understanding the core principles, a complete picture requires consideration of global supply chains and political retaliations.
pip install plotly numpy
python steel_tariff_model.py
interactive_steel_tariff_graph.html
in the project directory.